Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
From: John Stracke <jstracke at centivinc.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 09:10:59 -0500
Organization: Centiv
References: <03AEC69766E56C41B535148ECBE87C67023C5B@mm_w2k1.micromedical.local>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Sean Jones wrote:

I understand where I went wrong. But I doubt that any commercial enterprise would want to block access to MS servers in RL.

Well, it'd be a good way to inhibit people from sneaking Windows into the company.

--
/===============================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke at centivinc.com                      |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com                    |
|Centiv            |My opinions are my own.                     |
|===============================================================|
|If you're going to walk on thin ice, you might as well *dance*!|
\===============================================================/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

References:
- RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
  - From: Sean Jones

Prev by Date: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Next by Date: Re: mail headers for announce
Previous by thread: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Next by thread: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.