Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

To: Ross Finlayson <finlayson at live.com>
Subject: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
From: RJ Atkinson <rja at extremenetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:25:54 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4.3.1.1.20021116212913.00bb21e0@laptop-localhost>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Sunday, Nov 17, 2002, at 00:34 America/Montreal, Ross Finlayson wrote:

I thought there was consensus to try not to hold IETF meetings in the Bay Area?


Agree, because they are over-run with local tourists and it was
impossible to get work done.

However, IETF Chair has the authority to approve/select meeting venues.

Ran

References:
- Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
  - From: Ross Finlayson

Prev by Date: Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
Next by Date: Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
Previous by thread: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by thread: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.