Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?

To: Paul Ebersman <ebersman at pae.com>
Subject: Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:10:38 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200211151732.gAFHWwfC055390@gwydion.dragon.net>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-to: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

moore> I use mh, but I don't use message/external-body.  It's not that
moore> the feature is a bad idea, it's that mh's user interface for it
moore> is too annoying to use.


my own experience is that mh's user interface for mh is too annoying
to use.

L.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at ee.surrey.ac.uk>

References:
- Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
  - From: Paul Ebersman

Prev by Date: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by Date: Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
Previous by thread: Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
Next by thread: Re: Does anyone use message/external-body?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.