Re: axfr-clarify on the move again

To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb at cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: axfr-clarify on the move again
From: Kenji Rikitake <kenji at k2r.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:27:54 +0900
Cc: dns at list.cr.yp.to, namedroppers at ops.ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org, Kenji Rikitake <kenji at k2r.org>
In-reply-to: <20021119204308.52994.qmail@cr.yp.to>; from djb@cr.yp.to on Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:42:46PM -0000
References: <20021117211006.98837.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20021118033728.GA13838@codeblau.de> <20021119204308.52994.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i-jp0

To the readers of this mail:

I would like to urge that the database structure of BIND MUST NOT define
the semantics of DNS.  Breaking the RFC1034 model which assures the
uniqueness of DNS RR integrity will significantly hamper the fundamental
security of the current non-cryptographic DNS, which is still heavily
dependent of the uniqueness of AXFR-transferred data.  If you all
disapprove A6, please do NOT approve such an idea, again.

// Kenji Rikitake

References:
- Re: axfr-clarify on the move again
  - From: D. J. Bernstein

Prev by Date: Re: Restatement of my proposal from last night's plenary
Next by Date: Re: the 'hallway' jabber group chat
Previous by thread: Re: axfr-clarify on the move again
Next by thread: Re: axfr-clarify on the move again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: axfr-clarify on the move again

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.