RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
From: "Michel Py" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:28:49 -0800
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcKSvk6ZpqCeP5GmRmW7ff0wYfE4gQAeJO5Q
Thread-topic: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

Harald,

I have two dumb questions about IETF-56:

1. My understanding is that there is no host and no terminals. Does it
mean no wireless setup too?

2. Is there a reason the meeting location is not posted with the dates?

Thanks
Michel.

Prev by Date: Re: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You
Next by Date: Re: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You
Previous by thread: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by thread: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.