Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

To: "Michel Py" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at research.att.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:13:32 -0500
Cc: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>, ietf at ietf.org
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

In message <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B046405E4B0 at server2000>, "Michel Py" wri
tes:
>Harald,
>
>I have two dumb questions about IETF-56:
>
>1. My understanding is that there is no host and no terminals. Does it
>mean no wireless setup too?

THere will be wireless.
>
>2. Is there a reason the meeting location is not posted with the dates?
>

It is posted at http://www.ietf.org/meetings/0mtg-sites.txt .  But if 
you mean the hotel -- that's always released a bit later.  

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)

Prev by Date: ietf 55
Next by Date: Re: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You
Previous by thread: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by thread: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.