RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

To: Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at research.att.com>
Subject: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:40:50 +0100
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B04640BD42F@server2000>
References: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B04640BD42F@server2000>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

The tradition is that the hotel information is not released until the negotiation of the room block has been completed.

I don't know where that stands at the moment.

--On lørdag, november 23, 2002 15:45:22 -0800 Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:

Steve Bellovin wrote:
But if you mean the hotel -- that's always released a bit later.


That's what I meant. Would be nice to know in advance, for those of us
that shop for price and want to book a hotel within walking distance of
the IETF meeting.

Michel.

References:
- RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by Date: Re: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You
Previous by thread: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Next by thread: RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.