Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
From: Joe Baptista <baptista at dot-god.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:42:53 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <owner-ietf at ietf.org>, Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, Rick Wesson <wessorh at ar.com>, Steve Hotz <hotz at NEW.NET>, <pekkas at netcore.fi>, <vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <13029654450.20021127143625@tribalwise.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Dave Crocker wrote:

> if new.net were so sure of the efficacy of their approach, why do they
> (redundantly) use new.net in the ICANN/IANA root?

they want to be backwards compatible with the old legacy internet.

References:
- Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued
Next by Date: Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued
Previous by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.