Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

To: mark.harris at IITO.ORG
Subject: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:13:35 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:19:28 EST.") <NBEDKJAHLIAJNAIPHFFDGEFHCFAA.mark.harris@iito.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> If when .com breaks, the other TLDs still work...
> then, isn't that a good reason to have more TLDs?

it's a good reason to not put all of your eggs in one basket.

also by limiting the size of the root we make it somewhat easier
to verify that the root is working correctly.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
  - From: Marc Schneiders

References:
- RE: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
  - From: Mark Harris

Prev by Date: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by Date: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Previous by thread: RE: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.