Re: namedroppers mismanagement, continued

[Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>]

At 11:50 AM 11/27/2002 -0500, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> Regardless of the specifics of this case, I think a good rule would be to
> say that all bounced messages on any IETF list MUST be archived on a
> separate 'bounced' list.

Sounds good on the surface, but you might want to reconsider operationally.

We drop probably 30-40 messages a day from the IAB list, mostly KLEZ 
Viruses, 419 scams, spam in oriental characters, and random other sales 
stuff. This is after having moved it from iab at isi.edu to iab at ietf.org; 
you'd be amazed how much crud goes to the former list.

Since it is a members-only list, we *do* use a "recognized persons" list to 
reduce the filtering load; this has allowed a few virus-mails through, but 
not much. In acting as one of the four moderators for six months, I have 
"approved" perhaps a dozen messages total, and in each case added the 
sender to the "recognized sender" list so I don't have to mess with it. The 
recognized senders, btw, include all IESG members and all working group 
chairs as of a certain date, and we add other folks as needed. The 
kooks-and-nonsense notes I have silently discarded have been less than I 
allowed through, perhaps three or four at most.

I think it is positively dangerous to archive Klez emails, and a waste of 
online storage. A person reviewing the email might open the application.

I could see archiving the kooks-and-nonsense email. It wouldn't be a very 
interesting archive - you have to *earn* a place on that list, and as a 
result I'll bet that most folks on this list have that list built into 
their individual email filters already. But I really don't see the value of 
archiving the spam.