Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

To: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin at law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:55:53 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:44:04 EST." <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212021337450.14994-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212021337450.14994-100000@spitfire.law.miami.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:44:04 EST, "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" said:
> I dispute the accuracy of this assertion below (unless "registrars" is a
> typo for "registries" in which case we agree totally and you can ignore
> what follows):

I meant registries, and we *are* in agreement. ;)

Attachment: pgpyZwzpMdrLo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
  - From: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law

Prev by Date: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by Date: Re: Obsolete it, when you cannot reform it? (Was: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You))
Previous by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Next by thread: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.