Re: namedroppers, continued

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: namedroppers, continued
From: Aaron Swartz <me at aaronsw.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:42:36 -0600
Cc: iesg at ietf.org, namedroppers at ops.ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CE541259607DE94CA2A23816FB49F4A34D60B6@vhqpostal6.verisign.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

The only way to resolve this issue properly would be to require every
submission to an IETF mailing list to be cryptographically signed
[and] to require the subscribers to register their signing key


And how do we prevent spammers from registering their signing key? Are
you suggesting that we change the IETF's open enrollment policy?

--
Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com]

References:
- RE: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Obsolete it, when you cannot reform it? (Was: Re: new.net (was: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You))
Next by Date: RE: namedroppers, continued
Previous by thread: RE: namedroppers, continued
Next by thread: Re: namedroppers, continued
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: namedroppers, continued

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.