Re: namedroppers, continued

To: Bill Cunningham <billc44 at citynet.net>
Subject: Re: namedroppers, continued
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 01:12:23 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:47:45 EST." <002901c29f46$802c28e0$da44903f@a>
References: <200212090409.gB949ZmG003443@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <200212090509.gB959Gg2016347@calcite.rhyolite.com> <002901c29f46$802c28e0$da44903f@a>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:47:45 EST, Bill Cunningham <billc44 at citynet.net>  said:
> How about passing a law that makes eveyone install a BIOS patch to block out
> spam. ;-)

There exist systems that don't have a BIOS. ;)

(Making this reply mostly because there's been serious DRM proposals
that have this same exact problem).

Attachment: pgpAlNUEawkfH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Vernon Schryver
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Bill Cunningham

Prev by Date: Re: namedroppers, continued
Next by Date: RE: namedroppers, continued
Previous by thread: Re: namedroppers, continued
Next by thread: Re: namedroppers, continued
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: namedroppers, continued

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.