Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
From: Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 16:50:43 -0500
Cc: vkompella at timetranetworks.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:22:31 -0500. <200212092022.gB9KMVj03042@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Reply-to: erosen at cisco.com
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> The  workings  of  special  interest  groups  can  and  often  do  have  a
> significant effect  on the general  population, but nobody can  afford the
> time and  energy it takes  to keep track  of every special  interest group
> that might affect him.

Often  it  seems as  though  the  WGs reflect  the  broad  consensus of  the
community, and the IESG is the special interest group.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
  - From: grenville armitage
- Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Reminder: Deadline for input on sub-ip discussion
Next by Date: Re: namedroppers, continued
Previous by thread: Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
Next by thread: Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: a personal opinion on what to do about the sub-ip area

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.