Re: namedroppers, continued

To: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu, Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: namedroppers, continued
From: Edward Lewis <edlewis at arin.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:47:58 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200212092153.gB9Lr73J007759@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20021206132845.01b56f88@mira-sjcm-4.cisco.com> <200212062315.gB6NFLoM007403@calcite.rhyolite.com> <021c01c29fb0$fd8382b0$ae876540@amer.cisco.com> <200212092153.gB9Lr73J007759@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 16:53 -0500 12/9/02, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

However, "authorization" usually implies "authentication" beforehand.
Does anybody  have a reference on an authorization scheme that
doesn't imply any authentication?


World readable files.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

References:
- RE: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Fred Baker
- RE: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Vernon Schryver
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Stephen Sprunk
- Re: namedroppers, continued
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

Prev by Date: Re: namedroppers, continued
Next by Date: Re: Reminder: Deadline for input on sub-ip discussion
Previous by thread: Re: namedroppers, continued
Next by thread: Re: namedroppers, continued
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: namedroppers, continued

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.