Re: Reminder: Deadline for input on sub-ip discussion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reminder: Deadline for input on sub-ip discussion





Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
All,
< snip >
If you have a strong preference for one (or two) of these, and have not yet said so, please indicate your opinion (and your reasons) by mail to ietf at ietf.org before Thursday.

my preferences are 2 or 3, so far i've not seen any other argument for 1 other than it was decided 2 years ago, if we really want the 3 of the wg's to finish let them do so with re-org

i strongly doubt that ccamp, mpls and ppvpn are candidates for closing
down in 6 months

it seems like the arguments by keith, fred and joe are good arguments
for that these wg's need a focus of their own

if you believ that they are doing harm, that is not reason to re-org,
closing down would be called for

if you believe they are doing good, let them continue to do so

in neither case shuffle groups around helps

i can live with status quo

/Loa

--
Loa Andersson

Mobile          +46 739 81 21 64
Email           loa at pi.se





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.