Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify

To: bill at strahm.net
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:03:10 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:14:16 PST.") <001101c2a6e2$d16e1f30$6501a8c0@reveille>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> I hope EVERYONE deeply involved in a WG documentation process has deep
> DEEP conflict of interest problems.

seems a bit of a stretch.  it's one thing to have an interest in producing
a technically sound outcome; quite another to have an interest in producing
a particular outcome even when it has technical problems.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
  - From: Bill Strahm

References:
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
  - From: Bill Strahm

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF Version 2 to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF Version 2 to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
Next by thread: RE: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.