Re: namedroppers, continued
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: namedroppers, continued





--On mandag, januar 06, 2003 02:01:27 -0500 Doug <Dougxx2 at carolina.rr.com> wrote:

Your proposal would fix the problem, but end up tossing a large quantity
of babies out with the bathwater.  The problem is that for the case of
a mailing list, you have *4* (at least) things to keep track of:

There are many comercial email servers that require the people sending email with their server to log into the server using a valid username and pass before doing so. I doubt they are losing any valid emails. All it does is to keep unauthorized users from using the server without a valid password. The reason to require that the sender address in the outgoing email matches the email address refrenced in the account is to keep people from sending spam from these email servers and using fraudulant return and/or sender address. I fail to see how this throws out any babies. perhaps I am missing something.

well....think about how mail from someone who is not an user of that system (like me) can send mail there....


how does your system tell the difference between a remote mail server and a malicious user?

                Harald





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.