Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

To: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
Subject: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:48:23 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb at cr.yp.to>, "" <ietf at ietf.org>, "" <iesg at ietf.org>, "" <namedroppers at ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200302151239.h1FCdCd6028798@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Organization: speaking for none
References: <200302151239.h1FCdCd6028798@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Reply-to: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 Mark.Andrews at isc.org wrote:

> >    (2) My software doesn't allow that configuration.
>
> 	Well as we keep pointing out your software is BROKEN.

Saying it's broken implies the act of breakage.

At what point was the software NOT broken?

L.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at ee.surrey.ac.uk>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
  - From: Mark . Andrews

References:
- Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
  - From: Mark . Andrews

Prev by Date: Re: Appeal against IESG decision
Next by Date: XMLCONF Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
Next by thread: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.