Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
From: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:16:04 +1100
Cc: Mark_Andrews at isc.org, "D. J. Bernstein" <djb at cr.yp.to>, "" <ietf at ietf.org>, "" <iesg at ietf.org>, "" <namedroppers at ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:48:23 -0000." <Pine.GSO.4.50.0302171251240.3134-100000@artemis.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 Mark.Andrews at isc.org wrote:
> 
> > >    (2) My software doesn't allow that configuration.
> >
> > 	Well as we keep pointing out your software is BROKEN.
> 
> Saying it's broken implies the act of breakage.
> 
> At what point was the software NOT broken?

	In the original design specs.  RFC 1034 and RFC 1035.  If
	they had been followed then we wouldn't be havin this
	discussion.
 
	Mark
> L.
> 
> <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at ee.surrey.ac.uk>
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
  - From: Lloyd Wood

References:
- Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
  - From: Lloyd Wood

Prev by Date: XMLCONF Proposal
Next by Date: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
Previous by thread: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
Next by thread: Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.