Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus



On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:48:23 GMT, Lloyd Wood said:

> Saying it's broken implies the act of breakage.
> 
> At what point was the software NOT broken?

It's quite conceivable the software was BAD (Broken As Designed).

It's pretty clear to me that either djbdns or BIND was BAD. I'm just not
sure which.. :)

http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/BAD.html

Attachment: pgp55bh5Tr8bG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.