Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!

Subject: Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
From: "Chris Lewis" <clewis at nortelnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 16:20:21 -0500
Cc: asrg at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
References: <3E683B23.404@americasm01.nt.com> <200303071843.h27Ih97U018120@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

Vernon Schryver wrote:

From: "Chris Lewis" <clewis at nortelnetworks.com> Vernon wrote:
I think they should also use the DCC to reject all bulk mail, but
that's probably only my bias speaking.
That's a _much_ better idea than banning specific character sets or mime.

Maybe so or maybe not.  Using the DCC to reject all bulk mail would
prune a lot of conference announcements and calls for papers.  I think
that would be a good thing, but I know others disagree with me.


Not _inbound_ to the IETF.

Only if they spammed it, got DCC reports, and then forwarded to the IETF would it get blocked. Which is what you want, no?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
  - From: Vernon Schryver

References:
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
  - From: Vernon Schryver

Prev by Date: Re: A charter for the IESG
Next by Date: PL PMTUD BOF
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.