Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad at fnal.gov>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:08:28 -0600
Cc: ekr at rtfm.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:35:19 EST. <20030312123519.20b4a2d7.moore@cs.utk.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> > There's no reason a protocol can't be spec'd to let the client convey
> > the name of the resource before the TLS handshake begins. 
> 
> no, there isn't.  but it still wouldn't give the client a way to verify
> that the server is authoritative for that domain.

<irony>If it isn't, your trust in the CA that issued its certificate
is misplaced.</irony>

References:
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: A charter for the IESG
Next by Date: Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
Previous by thread: Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
Next by thread: RE: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.