Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken

To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>
Date: 16 Mar 2003 17:20:47 -0500
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>, Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>, <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303161417470.12428-100000@twin.uoregon.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303161417470.12428-100000@twin.uoregon.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Joel Jaeggli <joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu> writes:
> looks like major issues I was observing are in the past.

We should have the backup servers up in the next hour which will
provide us with more redundancy. We'll also be extending the lease
time a bunch more so that we can survive outages better.

Perry

References:
- Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
  - From: Joel Jaeggli

Prev by Date: Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Next by Date: Re: Why not a ".IETF" TLD? (was: Re: Financial state of the IETF...)
Previous by thread: Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Next by thread: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.