Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken

To: Tom Marshall <tmarshall at real.com>
Subject: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:28:30 -0500
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars at ISI.EDU>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:23:17 PST." <20030318052317.GA24552@real.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

In message <20030318052317.GA24552 at real.com>, Tom Marshall writes:
>

>>=20
>> Browser issue?
>
>No, I verified with this:
>
>  $ telnet www.rfc-editor.org 80
>  Trying 3ffe:801:1000:0:2d0:b7ff:c0de:3...
>  Connected to www.rfc-editor.org.
>  Escape character is '^]'.
>  GET / HTTP/1.0
>
>  [... wait a couple minutes ...]
>  ^]
>  telnet> q
>  Connection closed.
>
>My IPv6 address is 2001:460:410:8128::/64.

Odd -- that exact sequence, using telnet, worked for me.  (I'm running 
NetBSD 1.6.1_RC2, if that matters.)


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
  - From: Tom Marshall

References:
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
  - From: Tom Marshall

Prev by Date: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Next by Date: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Previous by thread: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Next by thread: Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.