Re: slide fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: slide fonts

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: slide fonts
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:06:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <011b01c2f18f$c372e760$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Mail-followup-to: Scott W Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <87el53cikg.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <693899997.20030320094052@brandenburg.com> <011b01c2f18f$c372e760$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 02:58:47PM -0800, Randy Presuhn allegedly wrote:
> Black and white is the sensible choice.  I recall one
> presentation that used red to identify important points.
> It will probably lose much of its impact in the hardcopy
> proceedings.  :-)

I don't know anyone who has asked for hardcopy proceedings for years.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: slide fonts
  - From: John Stracke

References:
- slide fonts
  - From: Perry E. Metzger
- Re: slide fonts
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: slide fonts
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: Re: slide fonts
Next by Date: Re: Barrel-bottom scraping
Previous by thread: Re: slide fonts
Next by thread: Re: slide fonts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.