Re: slide fonts

[Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3 at torque.pothole.com>]

That's because the price was suddenly jacked up to a totally absurd
figure.

Thanks,
Donald
======================================================================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                       dee3 at torque.pothole.com
 155 Beaver Street              +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                   Donald.Eastlake at motorola.com

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:14:48 +0100
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
> To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>, ietf at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: slide fonts
> 
> we just decided to stop publishing hardcopy proceedings.
> A whooping 8 people ordered them from San Francisco.
> 
>              Harald
> 
> --On søndag, mars 23, 2003 14:58:47 -0800 Randy Presuhn 
> <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi -
> >
> >> From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
> >> To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>
> >> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:40 AM
> >> Subject: Re: slide fonts
> > ...
> >> The usual rule is never go below 18pt. 24-28pt is the better choice.
> >>
> >> Equally important is contrast.  Use only primary colors and make sure
> >> that text always is very high contrast with its background.
> > ...
> >
> > Black and white is the sensible choice.  I recall one
> > presentation that used red to identify important points.
> > It will probably lose much of its impact in the hardcopy
> > proceedings.  :-)
> >
> > Randy