Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
From: Tim Chown <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:47:06 +0000
In-reply-to: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA026A056D@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA026A056D@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:48:44PM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
> 
> My Windows-XP laptop currently has 14 IPv6 addresses, and 2 IPv4
> addresses. The sky is not falling.

Except of those 14 some seven(?) are RFC3041 addresses, which break a
number of applications... so there are some clouds in the sky.

Tim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
  - From: Tony Hain
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
  - From: Matt Crawford

References:
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
  - From: Christian Huitema

Prev by Date: FW: [ga] ITU-T Workshops on E-Health, E-Government, and Next Gene ration Ne tworks
Next by Date: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Previous by thread: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Next by thread: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.