Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

[John Stracke <jstracke at centive.com>]

Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> As you know, I was in favor of setting aside a prefix (FECO::, in fact)
> for use as private address space (either on disconnected networks, or
> behind NATs), but the consensus of the folks in the IPv6 WG meeting
> was to deprecate that prefix altogether.  There were several compelling
> arguments from operators and others that we don't need a special prefix
> for disconnected sites...

Besides, we have three such prefixes, given RFC-1918 and 6to4: 
2002:A00::/24, 2002:AC10::/28, and 2002:C0A8::/32.

--
/============================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke at centive.com                     |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com                   |
|Centive           |My opinions are my own.                  |
|============================================================|
|"God does not play games with His loyal servants." "Whoo-ee,|
|where have you *been*?" --_Good Omens_                      |
\============================================================/