Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

To: "Michel Py" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Subject: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis at kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:06:43 +0100
Cc: "Ted Hardie" <hardie at qualcomm.com>, "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf at tndh.net>, "The IETF" <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F54D29@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Because such thing does not exist, it's called PI and is not available
to IPv6 end-sites. And if it ever is, it will cost money or other
annoyances to obtain.

SLs won't come for free either. Architecture aside, I prefer people that use a service to pay for it rather than the community as such. Then I also happen to think that SLs break the architecture but that is something else...

- kurtis -

References:
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Next by Date: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Previous by thread: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Next by thread: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.