Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

[John Stracke <jstracke at centive.com>]

Keith Moore wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:31:23 -0500
> John Stracke <jstracke at centive.com> wrote:
>  
>
> > Besides, we have three such prefixes, given RFC-1918 and 6to4: 
> > 2002:A00::/24, 2002:AC10::/28, and 2002:C0A8::/32.
> >    
>
> the same problems exist for these as for SLs.
Right.

> we should deprecate these
> also when we revise 6to4.
>  
Perhaps; but, given the prevalence of RFC-1918 addresses, it's unlikely 
that anybody's going to build their 6to4 implementation to block it from 
using them.

--
/============================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke at centive.com                     |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com                   |
|Centive           |My opinions are my own.                  |
|============================================================|
|"God does not play games with His loyal servants." "Whoo-ee,|
|where have you *been*?" --_Good Omens_                      |
\============================================================/