RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))



Bill Manning wrote:

> 	Is may be worth noting that RIRs have -NEVER- made presumptions
> 	on routability of the delegations they make.

Did you just say 69/8 ? :)

If an ISP chooses not to make a specific prefix reachable
it is there 'problem'/policy, not much to do about it.

Also anybody could just start up a Registry where one can
register IP addresses for their "Cybernet" or whatever
they call it. No need to go to the RIR's. The addresses
won't be accepted by the Internet community though ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.