Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad at fnal.gov>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:49:03 -0600
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:08:56 EST. <5.1.0.14.2.20030331151741.049a5c10@mail.windriver.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> Let's assume that there is a FooBar server in SiteA.  If another
> node in SiteA (NodeA) is communicating via a multi-party application
> to a node in SiteB (NodeB), and wants to refer NodeB to the FooBar
> server in SiteA, what does it do?

I thought we agreed, completely outside of IPv6 concerns, that
shipping addresses in application data was bad. So NodeA refers
NodeB to foobar-server.sitea.org. Q.E.F.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Margaret Wasserman

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by Date: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Previous by thread: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by thread: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.