Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

To: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen at unfix.org>
Subject: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:28:43 -0500
Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu, huitema at windows.microsoft.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <002b01c2f7d4$1ffc6fc0$210d640a@unfix.org>
References: <20030331165617.1398541e.moore@cs.utk.edu> <002b01c2f7d4$1ffc6fc0$210d640a@unfix.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> This has nothing to do with sitelocal but more with the
> fact that a host can have multiple paths from A to B: internet ;)

multiple paths does not imply multiple addresses.

References:
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Keith Moore
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Jeroen Massar

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by Date: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Previous by thread: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by thread: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.