draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt
From: Simon Josefsson <jas at extundo.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:36:59 +0200
Cc: Rick McGowan <rick at unicode.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

One topic that is important to some people appears to be missing from
this document: what licensing scheme the Unicode Consortium uses for
their standards.  It would be useful to include a discussion on the
differences between how the Unicode standard and IETF documents can be
(re-)distributed and used by implementors.

Specifically: Some parts of the Unicode standards cannot be
redistributed, which has consequences for some implementors that want
to support Unicode with CJK in IETF protocols.

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by Date: RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses
Previous by thread: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by thread: RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

draft-rmcgowan-unicode-procs-02.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.