Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

To: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen at unfix.org>
Subject: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:24:56 -0500
Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu, spencer_dawkins at yahoo.com, ietf at ietf.org, ipv6-fb at microsoft.com
In-reply-to: <006a01c2f92b$1f5c7c60$210d640a@unfix.org>
References: <20030402130833.67087.qmail@web10903.mail.yahoo.com> <006a01c2f92b$1f5c7c60$210d640a@unfix.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> There was some discussion about this deprecation as the
> Techpreviews (Win2k/NT4) did support literal url's.
> The XP version and up though won't support it to overcome
> one major 'problem': website 'designers' embedding IP's
> inside websites to 'speed things up' (go figure).

perfectly reasonable thing to do.  browsers that don't support it are
broken.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Jeroen Massar

References:
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Jeroen Massar

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Previous by thread: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by thread: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.