RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

To: "'Keith Moore'" <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen at unfix.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:34:37 +0200
Cc: <spencer_dawkins at yahoo.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>, <ipv6-fb at microsoft.com>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20030402112456.63b5dac6.moore@cs.utk.edu>
Organization: Unfix
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu] wrote:

> > There was some discussion about this deprecation as the
> > Techpreviews (Win2k/NT4) did support literal url's.
> > The XP version and up though won't support it to overcome
> > one major 'problem': website 'designers' embedding IP's
> > inside websites to 'speed things up' (go figure).
> 
> perfectly reasonable thing to do.  browsers that don't support it are
> broken.

It's perfectly reasonable to not support RFC2732? or?

Greets,
 Jeroen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by Date: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Previous by thread: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Next by thread: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.