![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Carsten,
Two questions for the community:
- Is this a good idea? - Does the person exist who could do a good job and is willing to do it?
Food for thought indeed!
Harald
One more point: An argument does not become stronger by being repeated more often. Of the 175 senders to this list last month, 20 of us contributed more than half the list traffic. If we have made our position clear, the argument is, I think, stronger if it is not repeated - and silence allows other voices to be heard.
Harald,
while I strongly agree with this entire message, there is also a danger of a "silent majority" in a mailing list. I believe the approach cited works best with a moderator that periodically attempts summaries of the results of the discussion. In WG mailing lists, this can be done by the working group chair. It's not clear who is playing this role in this list. (And I'm not trying to imply you should.)
Gruesse, Carsten
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.