RE: spam

To: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc at ginger.lcs.mit.edu>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: spam
From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:31:22 -0700
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcMkf8t94vzodZIdTg677yWG/ao5zgABji+Q
Thread-topic: spam

> Moreover, in the public policy debate that is going on now, policy
makers
> need to know what technical options are avaiable as they look at the
> spectrum
> of possible solutions (legal, technical, etc). The IETF has a role to
play
> there, too.

Absolutely. We need to get something like RFC1984. As bad as spam is, a
lot of the countermeasures have a significant cost. It is probably
necessarily so, as making e-mail easy to send also makes spam easy to
send, but different measures have different side effects, and that is
worth documenting.

-- Christian Huitema

Prev by Date: Re: spam
Next by Date: Re: please move the spam discussion elsewhere
Previous by thread: Re: spam
Next by thread: RE: spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: spam

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.