RE: spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: spam

To: "'Michel Py'" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, "'Paul Vixie'" <vixie at vix.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: spam
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf at tndh.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:24:38 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <963621801C6D3E4A9CF454A1972AE8F504F82C@server2000.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Reply-to: <alh-ietf at tndh.net>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Michel Py wrote:
> The reason I agree with Noel along the lines that the only 
> way is making spammers pay for sending email is not because I 
> don't think that we don't have what it takes to invent a 
> protocol, but because I think it will be torpedoed before it is born.

Which is just another way of saying we lack leadership.

Tony

References:
- RE: spam
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here
Next by Date: Re: spam
Previous by thread: RE: spam
Next by thread: Re: spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.