![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Not at all. If you want to address denial of service issues you need protocol enforcement points. The INTERnet is a bidging architecture between networks. Lets put asside the dogma and build the infrastucture the users need. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Moore Sent: Wed Jun 18 09:47:42 2003 To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu; pbaker at verisign.com; Ronald.vanderPol at rvdp.org; aarsenau at bbn.com; ietf at ietf.org Subject: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6) > I really wish that the IETF > had designed a decent NAT box spec that's an oxymoron. the basic premis of NAT is fundamnetally broken.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.