Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)



Not at all.

If you want to address denial of service issues you need protocol
enforcement points.

The INTERnet is a bidging architecture between networks. Lets put asside the
dogma and build the infrastucture the users need.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keith Moore
Sent:	Wed Jun 18 09:47:42 2003
To:	Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc:	moore at cs.utk.edu; pbaker at verisign.com; Ronald.vanderPol at rvdp.org;
aarsenau at bbn.com; ietf at ietf.org
Subject:	Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department
forma lly adopts IPv6)

> I really wish that the IETF
> had designed a decent NAT box spec

that's an oxymoron.  the basic premis of NAT is fundamnetally broken.




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.