Re: SIRs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIRs

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: SIRs
From: grenville armitage <garmitage at swin.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 21:23:29 +1000
Organization: Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures, Swinburne University of Technology
References: <F7083F6E-A1BC-11D7-84BB-000393414368@yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

S Woodside wrote:
	[..]
> There is no reason otherwise, that the bugtracker would engender a
> reduced quality of discourse about an I-D.

I'd be afraid of encouraging a new "toss the complaint
over the wall into the bugtracker, don't bother engaging the
WG to discuss/refine my proposed solution/edit" style of
interaction with I-D authors. No?

cheers,
gja

References:
- Re: SIRs
  - From: S Woodside

Prev by Date: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
Next by Date: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
Previous by thread: Re: SIRs
Next by thread: Re: full list for moderated list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.