Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr at rtfm.com>
Date: 19 Jun 2003 07:39:56 -0700
Cc: dts at senie.com, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20030619101050.2eb0bd0f.moore@cs.utk.edu>
References: <Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:19:12 PDT." <kju1amod9r.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com> <200306181937.AIN64606@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com> <kjbrwvkmu7.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com> <200306190344.h5J3iqPZ030084@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <kjptlak7tg.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com> <200306190456.h5J4ugPZ032549@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <kju1amod9r.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com> <5.2.1.1.2.20030619033719.0268e9c0@mail.amaranth.net> <20030619060744.391b92e6.moore@cs.utk.edu> <kj4r2mnp0r.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com> <20030619101050.2eb0bd0f.moore@cs.utk.edu>
Reply-to: EKR <ekr at rtfm.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)

Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu> writes:

> > If the customers are getting what they want, that seems to me that it
> > can hardly be characterized as a "mess". And you have yet to establish
> > that they're not getting what they want.
> 
> certainly the users I deal with are not getting what they want.
> others seem to be reporting similar experiences.

Then why don't they switch providers. Revealed preference suggests
that they *are* getting what they want, no matter how much
complaining.

-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr at rtfm.com]
                http://www.rtfm.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re[2]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Richard Welty
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Daniel Senie
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
Next by Date: Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn)
Previous by thread: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
Next by thread: Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.