Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)



> Keith, I don't get this argument. A NAPT is a firewall by your own 
> definition "I believe the primary purpose of firewalls should be to 
> protect the network, not the hosts, from abusive or unauthorized 
> usage." 

only if the policy that the user wants is exactly what the NAPT
provides.  it's unrealistic to assume that most NAPT users do not want
to run any apps that accept externally-originated traffic, ever.  it's
also unrealistic to assume that most threats to the networks are from
outside the network, or that any kind of perimeter security will protect
a network of significant size from attack.




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.