RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)



> I certainly don't share that assumption.  Then again, I don't share the
> assumption that any central coordinating authority is needed to set up
> conferencing services.

This is an interesting point. The XCON WG is about _Centralized_
conferencing platforms. Who does operate such centralized systems?

Thanks, Henry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:01 PM
> To: Henry Sinnreich
> Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu; Henry.Sinnreich at mci.com; rohan at cisco.com;
> vinton.g.cerf at mci.com; mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us; jon.peterson at neustar.biz;
> ietf at ietf.org; alan.johnston at mci.com; rsparks at dynamicsoft.com
> Subject: Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon)
> 
> > Are not service providers and network
> > managers the people supposed to bring these services into operation?
> 
> I certainly don't share that assumption.  Then again, I don't share the
> assumption that any central coordinating authority is needed to set up
> conferencing services.





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.