Re: Re[4]: national security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: national security

To: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony at atkielski.com>
Subject: Re: Re[4]: national security
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:15:04 -0500
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:06:26 +0100." <13-1973169458.20031128200626@atkielski.com>
References: <13-1973169458.20031128200626@atkielski.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:06:26 +0100, "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony at atkielski.com>  said:

> 33 bits

8,589,934,592 times as many addresses.  At current burn rates, it will take
us some 20 years to go through the *current* free IPv4 space.  And nobody's
proposed any killer app that will take millions of times more address
space.

Attachment: pgpj6USPgzFwv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re[4]: national security
  - From: Tim Chown

References:
- Re[4]: national security
  - From: Anthony G. Atkielski

Prev by Date: RE: national security
Next by Date: Re: Re[4]: national security
Previous by thread: Re[4]: national security
Next by thread: Re: Re[4]: national security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.