Re: national security

To: jfcm <info at utel.net>
Subject: Re: national security
From: "Michael H. Lambert" <lambert at psc.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:35:07 -0500
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.2.20031127212644.049baec0@mail.utel.net>
References: <C01FC9FDD15AF849BD9C7C26A91AF6AB12C408@w2k.w2kbraintec.braintec-consult.de> <000001c3b329$25c78690$b520a8c0@w2kbraintec.braintecconsult.de> <6.0.0.22.2.20031127212644.049baec0@mail.utel.net>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Dear jfc,

As far as I can tell, you have gone only by your initials on this thread. To help some of us weigh this discussion, could you please identify yourself by name and affiliation?

Regards,

Michael Lambert

-----------
Michael H. Lambert                      Network Engineer
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center        V: +1 412 268 4960
4400 Fifth Avenue                       F: +1 412 268 8200
Pittsburgh, PA  15213  USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: national security
  - From: jfcm

References:
- AW: IETF58 - Network Facts
  - From: Hans Peter Dittler
- national security
  - From: jfcm

Prev by Date: Re[2]: national security
Next by Date: Re: national security
Previous by thread: Re: national security
Next by thread: Re: national security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: national security

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.