Re[8]: national security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[8]: national security

To: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re[8]: national security
From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony at atkielski.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:33:13 +0100
In-reply-to: <2E4F351E-24EB-11D8-ACF1-000A9598A184@kurtis.pp.se>
References: <139-1972924125.20031128201031@atkielski.com> <2E4F351E-24EB-11D8-ACF1-000A9598A184@kurtis.pp.se>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Kurt Erik Lindqvist writes:

> so you are making claims and comments on something you don't even have
> bothered to read the basic documentation on. Wow.

Wait twenty years, and we'll see who's surprised.

References:
- Re[6]: national security
  - From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Re[6]: national security
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist

Prev by Date: Re[2]: IPv6 addressing limitations (was "national security")
Next by Date: Re[2]: IPv6 addressing limitations (was "national security")
Previous by thread: Re: Re[6]: national security
Next by thread: Re: Re[4]: national security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.