Re: Principles of Spam-abatement
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Principles of Spam-abatement



Ed Gerck wrote:
	[..]
> grenville armitage wrote:
	[..]
> > and thus have gained entry to your circle of
> > people-worth-talking-with.
> 
> Solely by what you wrote, my point exactly.

Actually, your point appeared to be that you'd respond to a
previously-unknown correspondent who wrote _about something you'd 
previously written_  (and I quote):

> > > If someone sends me a message asking for my comment
> > > because they read some other comment I wrote, do I really
> > > care who that someone is... or who they know?

You yourself have identified the criteria 'they read some other comment
I wrote', not just "they wrote something interesting". I observe
that the former criteria qualifies as a variant of "...who they know".

FWIW.

cheers,
gja
-- 
Grenville Armitage
http://caia.swin.edu.au
I come from a LAN downunder.




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.