Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>]

I don't KNOW that what I'm thinking is true, but I'm wondering to
myself if the target audience for protocol specification maintenance
is all in the IETF...

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald at alvestrand.no>
To: "Rick Stewart" <rick.stewart at theinternetco.net>; <ietf at ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Work effort? (Re: Proposed Standard and Perfection)


>
>
> --On 8. mars 2004 12:38 -0700 Rick Stewart
<rick.stewart at theinternetco.net>
> wrote:
>
> >> Standard.  In my experience the hardest part of getting a
document
> >> advanced is to collect the implementation report.
> >>
> >> Hence this modest proposal:
> >
> > [clip]
> >
> > I rather like the proposal. What's been lacking is any forum for
further
> > development of standards outside of mailing lists and IETF
meetings --
> > there's no tracking, and that's a major problem.
>
> in draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01, the concept of a "maintenance team"
> (called "IANA Team" in that document) was floated. This didn't get
much
> discussion. Is this something that's worth discussing as an idea?
>
>                       Harald
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message was passed through ietf_censored at carmen.ipv6.cselt.it,
which is a sublist of ietf at ietf.org. Not all messages are passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by IETF_CENSORED ML
Administrator (ietf_admin at ngnet.it).